Showing posts with label democrats. Show all posts
Showing posts with label democrats. Show all posts

Monday, June 4, 2012

When is the individual accountable for their bad behavior?

 

scumbag So.... at what point is the individual responsible for their own circumstances? At what point is it ok to hold a person accountable  for their actions?

For example; if a woman gets knocked up by a guy she has only known for two weeks, knowing that neither of them have jobs and that he has four babies by three other women, why should anyone else have to be a part of their equation in the form of being taxed to death to support the woman and child?

At what point do we say, YOU screwed up, not me? And at what point do we stop rewarding woman who drop babies like candy from a pez dispenser with welfare checks, WIC, free housing, free medical care, free daycare and free everything else when they clearly chose not to take advantage of free birth control?

And why do so many CONTINUE to support the behavior and entitlements that have rendered a large number of blacks as underclass citizens and in need of  government assistance (generational) for the last 60-70 years (by design… by democrats).

Let’s take the “gentleman” that has fathered THIRTY kids… if these children will end up being financial burdens on the state (taxpayers), why shouldn’t the state also have the right to sterilize men (or women) like him after the fifth kid? Tenth kid? Twentieth kid?  Why are men AND women simply allowed to procreate irresponsibly and then expect taxpayers to support their children.  When is enough really enough? Why do these people get to behave badly without consequences for their actions?!!

Shouldn’t there be some deterrents in place for this incredibly poor behavior and reckless regard for the welfare of the children they are producing? What are we waiting for… a 100 percent illegitimacy rate for blacks? We are already at 72 percent.  Do we let the white illegitimacy rate get to 72% before we say…. ummmm…. perhaps we should do something?

And for the foolish…. abortion is not the answer. That solution makes the individual even more callous and despicable.  Just throwing this in here because I know some mentally crippled person will use abortion as an argument for this issue.

Women:  have more respect for yourself. My goodness… how does a woman CHOOSE to be the third or fourth woman or even the THIRTIETH woman to “spread ‘en”  for a worthless seed dropper?  Take charge and create your own life circumstances by WAITING for a man that is willing to make you his wife instead of  a semen receptacle.  There is NOTHING cute about this behavior! 

And many of the fifty percent of citizens who pay taxes to support the non  tax payers that are guilty of this bad behavior (they usually end up paying no taxes, but get fat tax refunds)  are broke too. They can no longer afford to carry you…. and are just plain tired of you.

Thursday, April 19, 2012

But, but… this is common sense!

 

welfare imageThe state of Georgia  has recently passed a law that would require welfare recipients to be drug tested. Apparently, Republicans were for the law and Democrats were against it. One question: Why would Democrats be against such a common sense measure?  Are they playing political games again and trying to appeal to the welfare crowd in hopes of keeping and expanding a voting bloc?

Isn’t it common sense to ensure that tax dollars are not being wasted on crack, meth, marijuana or other drugs?  After all, citizens are paying taxes out the wazoo to support the entitlement crowd. Why not make sure that whoever is receiving benefits are not using it to buy drugs?

Many working  in the private sector are drug tested all the time, so why treat welfare recipients differently? 

Democrats state that this requirement would cause a burden to the recipients. The law will require recipients to pay for the test which runs $30.00 to $35.00, but if the test returns negative, then the recipient would be reimbursed with their first benefit check.  Since the recipient is being reimbursed, no burden is created in actuality.  And of course, Democrats are also using their typical rhetoric by claiming that Republicans are simply trying to “bash the poor”.

A similar bill was passed by the state of Florida, but of course the ACLU stepped in on behalf of a recipient that refused the testing. The Florida law has now been put on hold by a federal judge because it supposedly violates the Fourth Amendment: unreasonable search and seizure. 

When did welfare become a right under the Constitution? And if the practice of drug testing is constitutional for the private sector employee, why wouldn’t  it be for a welfare recipient?  After all, those private sector employees are footing the bill for the welfare recipient.

We don’t see such a fuss over drug testing in the private sector simply because people prefer to work.  And if one isn’t doing drugs, what’s the big deal?

I’m glad states are beginning to clamp down, or are at least trying to. The next step should be implementing strict oversight to tackle welfare fraud.

It’s time the feds let states govern themselves and stop using the Constitution to block things that are indeed  constitutional, but simply not liked by Democrats. It seems the only time Democrats  actually care about the Constitution is when they try to use it wrongly through their political games.

Wednesday, January 25, 2012

What We Have Become

 

We have gone from fighting for our freedom to giving it up to be controlled by the government; specifically, the political party that enslaved and murdered our ancestors.

We have gone from working hard to achieve success regardless of our circumstance,  to using our circumstance as an excuse to not work hard.

We have gone from striving for self sufficiency to being content with and dependent on governmental insufficiency.

We have gone from fighting to keep our families together to willfully creating life for a financial pittance handed to us by the government.

We have gone from fighting and literally dying to be educated, to allowing our children to drop out of school and enter prison at astronomical rates.

We have gone from believing in God or being true to our faith, to believing in and putting our faith in a political party, specifically the one that has and still is committing atrocities against our race.

We have gone from fighting for equal rights to accepting special rights, as if we are incapable of competing based on our own intellectual abilities.

We have become confortable in using slavery as an excuse to do nothing.

We have become comfortable wallowing in a perpetual state of victimhood.

We have become comfortable with excusing away our bad and barbaric behavior, often finding a way to invoke racism, instead of holding people accountable for their actions.

We have embraced a secular culture that is antithetical to our Christian beliefs and as a result, we have lost the ability to be ashamed of our actions. 

What we need to do now is focus on our youth. We need to reintroduce shame, especially in an era of all of these “this and that housewife” shows;  few male role models in the home, and secular churches. 

If we don’t focus on our youth enough  to at least plant the seeds of what decency and morality really is; or to show them how to think critically, I’ll  hate to see what we will become as a nation in the next 20 – 30 years.

Wednesday, January 11, 2012

Is Michelle the Victim of a Racist Stereotype?

 

Gayle King recently interviewed Michelle Obama and the conversation turned towards comments purportedly made in the book “The Obamas”, written by a former White House insider. Apparently, Michelle Obama is being painted as unhappy, frustrated, feeling burdened and angry.

Michelle Obama basically denied that there have been abnormal upheavals between her and White House staff members.  During the interview Michelle stated that from the time Barack Obama announced his candidacy, “that’s the image they have tried to paint me as… this angry black woman”. 

We don’t know what takes place behind those White House doors, but just as with other administrations, juicy tidbits, accusations and facts are bound to come out. We can only take that information and apply our common sense to determine what makes sense to us.

Something that helps us discern what is truth or fiction with these tell-tell books are the actual words of the subjects. In Michelle’s case, she has said some things that could lead some to believe that she probably is angry and frustrated. Remember that Carla Bruini, France’s first lady, disclosed in her book what Michelle Obama said about being America’s first lady “it’s hell. I can’t stand it”.  Are both of these authors lying?  They could probably sell just as many books with a feel-good take on Michelle/The Obamas.

What about Michelle’s public statements?  Remember when she said  “For the first time in my adult life, I’m proud of my country”?  And… “America is a downright mean country”?   Don’t forget the comment “All of this just for a flag?” at a 9/11 ceremony. 

It’s very plausible that Michelle Obama harbors anti-American sentiments after sitting in  Rev. Jeremiah Wright’s church, with her husband, listening to his incendiary comments for so many years. When you sit and listen to hate for so long, it seems reasonable that some of the venom will get into your system and stay there.

My best guess is that Michelle probably can be very difficult to deal with. Her facial gestures and body language is not warm and inviting.  Mix the non verbal communications with the verbal communications and  you get an image of a volatile Michelle.

Playing the race card is certainly not going to help  her. The comments in the book “The Obamas” came from someone on her side of the aisle; so, who is the “they” that she believes is trying to paint her as an angry black woman?  Interjecting the racial element only makes here look “angry”.   Think about it… what does she have to be pissed off about… the multi million dollar vacations?  Why would such a persona be attributed to her out of the blue? I know people lie, but there are many pieces to this puzzle that in my eyes, do not match Michelle’s explanation.

Actually, I can see how all of the parties, vacations and managing personal groomers and other staff  at taxpayer’s expense can be frustrating and burdensome! The stress and exhaustion from the jet-setting and shopping for cheap nine hundred dollar knock off purses would make anyone unhappy!  Leave her alone racist people!  She is a strong Black woman, who has a right and perhaps in her mind, a reason to be angry!

Monday, January 9, 2012

Liberal-Isms


I want to do whatever I want, when I want and I don’t want to be judged for, or made to feel bad about my actions.

I want to be told I’ve done a good job even though I have not.

I want a ribbon even if I lose the race so I won’t fee bad.

I want others to pay for my mistakes.

I don’t want to be held accountable for my actions because it would make me feel bad.


I’m a victim of my own mistakes and feel others should be responsible for fixing my mistakes.


I’m a victim of past transgressions and deserve special rights.

I’m different and I deserve special rights.

I feel all of us are victims of something, and therefore, the legal system punishes too harshly.

I feel that Blacks are victims of slavery…. still.

I don’t believe Blacks can be racist.

I feel some people just need more help than others and that help should be provided by the government.

I’m comfortable with the majority loosing rights, if it benefits me.

I’m for making the majority of people feel uncomfortable if it makes a few more comfortable.

I feel it’s unfair that those who work harder than me have more than me.

I shouldn’t have to earn what I deserve.

I’m entitled to great things, at any cost, unless I have to pay that cost.

I feel a human baby growing inside its mother is not a life, but an acorn is.

I feel most people are incapable of making intelligent decisions, so I must think for them.

I believe in God  but, the ideology of my political party is more important than God’s word.

This Conservative does not FEEL or BELIEVE that Liberals hear themselves when they speak.

Tuesday, December 20, 2011

Kim Jong is More Than IL…He’s Dead.

 

I can’t imagine anyone in their right mind loosing any sleep or tears over Kim Jong-IL’s passing. He was a cruel dictator that got off on having power over and holding the well being of others, including their life and death, in his hands.  Government produced news images coming out of North Korea are showing thousands of “mourners”, wailing and collapsing over his death,  But I don’t believe it’s true grief for one moment! I wouldn’t be surprised if there weren’t armed forces standing nearby to give these “mourners”  the incentive to give the performances of their lives…. especially if they had any desire to keep on living.

The North Korean dictator, formerly IL, now dead,  was a hardcore, God-less communist, with a God complex. I even saw a news clip showing a  young girl who had a successful surgery to remove cataracts, and she and her Father turned to a portrait of Jong-Il and began to bow, praise and thank him for her sight!  I hope that kind of forced adoration was worth it to Jong-Il during  his lifetime.

The behavior of citizens shown in the news footage being put forth by the government ran North Korean media actually reminds me of how people behaved over Obama, especially during the peak of his campaigning in  2008.  Children were singing songs about him, people were chanting his name, people were fainting in his presence, liberal pundits were getting tingles up and down their legs, the Obama girls made songs and videos about him and multiple people declared that “Obama will save us”! I think that kind of behavior is called idolatry? Yeah, I’m pretty sure that’s what it is.

Soon after the 2008 election and Obama’s win, quaky liberal Woody Allen suggested that Obama be granted dictatorship.  Now, while I think many of the North Koreans are displaying coerced mourning, there are some far left radicals that would LOVE to convert the USA into  a communist dictatorship. It’s hard to believe, but it’s true. 

Remember when Obama stated that “the Constitution is fundamentally flawed… it does not say what the government must do for people”?  Well, that’s because the Constitution is the law of our land and prevents the federal government from dictating our lives. Our Nation was designed as a Republic to PREVENT us from falling to a dictatorship. However, the Constitution is being marginalized at every given opportunity, right under our freedom loving noses!  There are too many who want a change in governmental structure; too many are misinformed and too many are flat out clueless!

Because of  the aforementioned types of citizens,  Liberals have been successful in creating an underclass of people who wants the government to provide their sustenance instead of earning it themselves.   And there are many who feel entitled to what others have earned instead of going out and earning their own way.

Unless we can decelerate the growth of the “entitled” faction and deprogram our youth who are being raised to think along the lines of socialism and communism, we will have our own Jong-IL someday. This possibility is not far fetched nor is it a conspiracy theory… it’s a goal of Democrats.. or Liberals or Progressives— they call themselves many things these days.  The Democrat Party is full  of Communist and Socialist.. they are in cahoots!  Take a look at the 1963 Communist Goals. These goals are well underway of being achieved. …. some have been achieved. Which of those goals do Democrats reject?

That age old adage “you never miss what you have until it’s gone'” is scarily appropriate relative to the freedoms we’ve known and loved as Americans. Think about the freedoms we’ve already lost. If more people don’t wake up, we are going to be a mirrored image of socialist Europe and eventually, Communist North Korea. I pray our country shall never see such dark days. I know I won’t see them because I’ll die fighting for my freedom before I’d ever bow to, or praise any man.

Friday, December 9, 2011

Santa and Poinsettias… Offensive? So NOT!

 

Is there even room left on the offensive list for poinsettias? Everything is put there nowadays. Even jolly old St. Nick has been tagged with the big O. Every time I turn around these days, some idiot somewhere is unreasonably relegating something to the offensive list. In this case, the idiocy is stemming from officials at an elementary school in Stockton, California. They have purportedly decided that Santa and poinsettias would create a pervasive theme favoring one religion over another. I always wonder where the outrage from parents is when I hear about such senselessness. All parents who celebrate Christmas should pick a day to OCCUPY that school! This is political correctness run on steroids.


I’ll tell you what is truly offensive… attempting to take away my voice because you don’t agree with it. It’s offensive to remove crosses and other Christian icons because it might offend someone of another faith or religion. It’s offensive to erode American traditions because people who came here from other countries might be offended. I’m more than offended! I’m disgusted and outraged at those who grant themselves the power to determine what is offensive or not for ALL of us! This kind of Liberal BS is destroying this country fiber by fiber! The uninformed and the clueless do not realize that such actions slowly but surely erodes away our freedoms. Taking from one to give to another under any circumstance is always a failure!


When others immigrate to the USA, they should be told that our culture and traditions are already in place and that we do not re-arrange our way of life to appease others. Newcomers and those choosing to subscribe to other religious beliefs should know from jump street that we are a Judeo-Christian nation based upon the principles of our founding. While Santa and poinsettias are not biblical, they are festive symbols associated with our celebration of the birth of Christ. They are considered traditional symbols of the Christmas season. Will schools soon teach kids that there is no Santa? Don’t laugh… schools are already subverting Christianity… kids can’t say God in schools anymore, remember?!


Where does this stop? The fact of the matter is it won’t stop because too many people are oblivious. Declaring Santa and poinsettias as offensive is just another part to the Left’s plot to secularize and socialize this country. I don’t know what it will take to awake the sleepers. Moreover, I’m totally offended when they sleep walk their behinds into a voting booth!

I deem the officials in Stockton to be Scrooges! Take that! And, if this blog happens to offend you, kiss my poinsettia!

I Didn’t Know Cucumbers Were So Racy!

Muslim Cleric's Warning: Cucumbers Too Sexy For Women | Fox News

I don’t blame this cleric for remaining unnamed because it seems he has some serious sexual issues. Perhaps he’s the one looking at bananas, cucumbers and carrots and getting hungry for something other than a salad or snack! Is it only cucumbers, bananas and carrots that turn you on, Sir, or does any phallic shaped object send you swooning?


At first glance, one might be tempted to laugh at this story, shake their heads in disbelief and simply dismiss it. I on the other hand look a little deeper. Since many wrongly classify Islam as a religion, this is a great opportunity for me to clarify what it really is. It’s NOT a religion; it’s a totalitarian political system where an elite few get to decide every aspect of life for the masses. This cleric obviously views cucumbers and such as “sexy”, and since he’s a cleric, he has the right to project his warped view on everyone else. When one lives under a totalitarian political system, there’s no recourse to this type of madness!


Does the idea of having a few people in our society determine every aspect of our lives sound fun? If you’re stupid it might. If you take a good look at those on the Left (yes, there is a connection to liberalism), you will see how they are already determining how we should live… well, they are certainly trying to! Entities like the EPA, environmental and global warming Nazis, the ACLU, NAACP, Unions and similar groups work to impose their radical views on us everyday and many of you fall for their ilk and their lies hook, line and sinker.


Speaking of hook, line and sinker, remember when the California Department of Water Resources shut off water to farmers in the Sacramento-San Joaquin area to protect the Delta Smelt? Turns out that this fish wasn’t so endangered after all, but the livelihood of farmers in the area were. They ended up in “soup lines” after their farmlands were turned into dust bowls. Their way of life was destroyed by a governmental agency.

Do you remember the arctic scientist that is to my knowledge, still under investigation for “integrity issues” and scientific misconduct? In other words, this scientist lied his ass off! By the way, it was this very scientist, Charles Monnett, who is in part responsible for the mega lie known as global warming. See what I mean? See how only a few are allowed to dictate to the masses? Get hip to their game people! We the People are losing our freedoms because not every one is paying attention and connecting the dots!


Now, if I were a Muslim woman, I think I’d actually prefer the cucumber to my male counterpart any day… maybe that’s the cleric’s fear! I’ve heard stories of women doing “private” things with cucumbers, etcetera, but at today’s prices, food is just too damn high to do anything with it other than eat it!

Tuesday, December 6, 2011

Cain Was Guilty…. Of Being a Conservative!


No blue stained dresses. No taped recorded messages. No witnesses whatsoever. There has been no corroboration for any of the multiple claims of sexual harassment against Cain, and of the bevy of skanks making such claims, only one had filed a formal complaint against him. After an internal investigation, that complaint was found to be unsubstantiated. Not even an alleged thirteen year long affair could yield irrefutable evidence against Cain. One would think that a thirteen year affair would yield evidence greater than our nation’s deficit!  That was not the case. The only evidence produced after thirteen years were anemic records of phone and text messages showing only the time and date that calls were made and messages sent… and most of those calls and messages were initiated by the complainant. From what I’ve gleaned, Cain is probably innocent of inappropriate behavior; however, he is guilty of something far more ominous… Cain is guilty of CWB!!

You’ve heard the phrase DWB (driving while Black) right? Well, the CWB phenomenon is being Conservative While Black! Oh yeah… it’s real!! You get no love from the Black Community if you’re Black and Conservative! Black liberals, especially those with notoriety, can molest children (Michael Jackson)… on tape (R. Kelly); murder two people (OJ Simpson); be a druggie (Marion Berry); beat their women (Chris Brown); kill dogs (Michael Vick) and just about anything else under the sun, and the Black community will forgive them! Most Blacks will stand by a Black Liberal, right or wrong, before they will ever let “tha (fictional) man” bring them down! The fact that NO so-called Black leaders (they’re actually misleaders) defended Cain should prove that when Blacks call for unity in the Black communities, they’re certainly not including us Black Conservatives. We are looked upon as the enemy… and that’s a crying shame!

You see, being CONSERVATIVE WHILE BLACK is THE unforgivable sin as far as Blacks are concerned. You will never hear the inarticulate chants or rhymes from Jessie Jackson in defense of the Black Conservative. Neither will you ever see Big Perm-- I mean Al Sharpton marching or boycotting in protest of a Black Conservative. That’s because Black Conservatives don’t promote that “Blacks are victims of slavery” mentality that Sharpton and Jackson perpetually reiterate to keep the flames of racism burning. They are race baiters, so they actually need racial division in order to prosper. Conservatives believe that every American has equal opportunity, but many simply don’t take advantage of their freedoms. If Blacks could become doctors and lawyers during the era of slavery, what’s stopping that success today?

Black Conservatives are like kryptonite to both the Liberal and Republican establishment elites! Lord forbid that Herman Cain made it to the White House and actually made a difference! Blacks and others could very well open their eyes and see that the only way to secure happiness and prosperity is by their own strengths, and not because of any politician, government entitlements and certainly not because of any community “misleaders”. The realization of self-sufficiency would destroy the establishment elite’s power structure because every American would be fighting for the same thing… protection of their rights and protection to be their own fisherman and to prosper. This realization would also be the beginning of restoring the power of We the People over government, which is how it was meant to be. But, since “the establishment” railroaded Cain out of the race, we will have to suffer a slower progression towards the restoration of power… it will happen… people are sick and tired of being sick and tired of the same politics as usual BS!

My goal, along with other Conservatives, is to help reach enough people, specifically Black people to prove former president Lyndon B. Johnson dead (pun intended) wrong. After he signed “that nigger bill”, more commonly known as the Civil Rights Act of 1964, he stated “I’ll have those niggers voting Democrat for the next 200 years”. Well, I think it’s time for Blacks to regain their political power… not for the sake of “blackness” but for the sake of saving our nation… besides, Democrats have owned the “nigger vote” (their words, not mine) for long enough!

Friday, December 2, 2011

Three-Fifths Clause: Let Me Explain It Again!


The Three-Fifths Compromise is a compromise that resulted during the Philadelphia Convention in 1787. It is found in the Constitution of the United States in Article 1,  Section 2,  Paragraph 3. This particular clause has been and still is a matter that causes mountains of  resentment for many Blacks; although unjustly so. The true intention or meaning of this clause has been grossly misunderstood by many. The key word in this clause for me is the word persons.  Notice the "s" at the end of persons? Since a person is defined as a human or individual, persons  would be defined as more than one individual... comprehendo? I hope we're at least in concurrence on the definition of person and persons.

Now, I'm going to post the clause for your review.  Most of those who don't understand it have never read it, so here ya go!
Representatives and direct Taxes shall be apportioned among the several States which may be included within this Union, according to their respective Numbers, which shall be determined by adding to the whole Number of free Persons, including those bound to Service for a Term of Years, and excluding Indians not taxed, three fifths of all other Persons. The actual Enumeration shall be made within three Years after the first Meeting of the Congress of the United States, and within every subsequent Term of ten Years, in such Manner as they shall by Law direct. The Number of Representatives shall not exceed one for every thirty Thousand, but each State shall have at Least one Representative; and until such enumeration shall be made, the State of New Hampshire shall be entitled to chuse three, Massachusetts eight, Rhode-Island and Providence Plantations one, Connecticut five, New-York six, New Jersey four, Pennsylvania eight, Delaware one, Maryland six, Virginia ten, North Carolina five, South Carolina five, and Georgia three.
Where does it read that Blacks, slaves, robots or anyone else is three-fifths of a human being? It does not.  The clause is referring to the number of PEOPLE in a state… whole people. This clause actually protected slaves by reducing the number of representatives the pro-slavery Southern Democrats could have.

The North and the South battled over the South’s greedy desire to include  their slaves in the census. The reason being is that the Southern Democrats had long stated that their slaves were NOT people or persons, but property.  The population of slaves were great in the south. In some instances, the slave population was equal to or were greater than the free population. If they could count slaves as persons , the Democrats could rack up on pro-slavery representation.

The Northern anti-slavery crowd said no way Jose!  They didn’t want to deal with even more pro-slavery, malevolent Democrats. The North decided that if the South could count their property as persons solely to gain greater representation, then they would count their property as well; chickens, goats, pigs, plows, horses (you get the point, right?) so they could gain more anti-slavery representation.  Nice move grasshoppers!

As it stood, states were allowed a representative for every 30,000 persons.  The compromise determined  that instead of counting free and enslaved persons, the South could only count three-fifths of the slave population… the entire population… the persons who were slaves…. get it? Enumerating only three-fifths of the slave population cut in half the number of pro-slavery representatives that could have been gained. After the compromise, the states could only gain a representative for every 50,000 persons instead of every 30,000 persons.  That was great news if you were a slave or anti-slavery…. that’s 50% less racists, greedy, enslaving Democrats that the North would have to deal with. 

If you’re wondering why Indians were specifically mentioned in the Constitution (Indians NOT TAXED), it’s not that they were counted as three-fifths human either. If they were not taxed, it’s most likely because they lived on tribal reservations or were nomadic. Indians who WERE taxed were enumerated.

If you are one of those people who thought the three-fifth clause counted ONE INDIVIDUAL slave as three-fifths human, and you still believe that, please don’t leave home without a helmet!

Sunday, November 27, 2011

Legacy of Democrats In Pictures: Graphic



The Democrat Party is the party of slavery, oppression, violation of human and civil rights, the Civil War, Black Codes, the KKK, lynching (including burning people alive), murders, abortions (introduced by the racist Democrat  Margaret Sanger as a means to exterminate the “human weeds”, meaning Blacks), Jim Crow, racial division,  and the destruction of the Black family unit. Why does this party still exist? Moreover, why do they garner 90%+ support from Blacks? Wow!

Why do so many Blacks LOVE the Democrats so much, but HATE Republicans and see that party as the party of racism, when the Republican Party was the party fighting to free slaves, give Blacks civil rights, passing anti-lynching laws, defeating the Black Codes and Jim Crow laws and fighting to give Blacks the right to be educated.  I shake my head in disbelief at what the Democrats/liberals/progressives/socialists/communists are doing and have been able to do and still prosper. What they have done historically and what they continue to do is unforgiveable in my book!  Black folk…. you’ve been “disrespected”!  Isn’t that a favorite phrase of so many Blacks…. “don’t disrespect me”?  Well… Democrats have been “disrespecting” we Black folk for hundreds of years!

Look at the atrocities visited on mankind, especially Blacks by the Democrat Party. An extensive amount of re-education is needed to expose historical truths and to reveal the true intent of the Democrat Party. That intent, in my opinion and based on their actions, is to create enough of an underclass in this nation to secure permanent power for their party and the Liberal elites. Before you call me crazy, pay attention to their policies and the outcome of implementing those policies. Black folk, look at the current circumstances of most Blacks… and then ask your self this question…has it been worth solely supporting Democrats for the past 50+ years?  Honestly?